Politics

/

ArcaMax

Editorial: SCOTUS -- Trump likely to 'succeed' in restructuring case

Las Vegas Review-Journal, Las Vegas Review-Journal on

Published in Op Eds

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed President Donald Trump to move forward with shrinking the federal workforce. The move is notable as much for the outcome as for the dynamics involved.

The case stemmed from an executive order the president issued early in February directing administration officials to formulate plans for “large-scale” personnel reductions. Several left-wing groups sued, and they found an agreeable federal judge in Northern California, who in May put the edict on permanent hold until the legal case could wind its way through the courts.

District Court Judge Susan Illston acknowledged “the prerogative of presidents to pursue new policy priorities and to imprint their stamp on the federal government.” But she held that, in “large-scale overhauls of federal agencies, any president must enlist the help of his co-equal branch and partner, the Congress.”

The White House appealed, arguing that Trump, as head of the executive branch, acted well within his authority. The Supreme Court agreed, for now. The justices didn’t rule whether the layoffs were wise, nor did they preclude future challenges to the firings. But in an unsigned order, they lifted the stay, holding that the administration was likely to “succeed on its argument” and could implement its restructuring plan even if the justices later determine that parts of it were improperly executed.

Progressives fighting the Trump order were aghast, writing that “there will be no way to unscramble that egg. If the courts ultimately deem the president to have overstepped his authority and intruded upon that of Congress, as a practical matter there will be no way to go back in time to restore those agencies, functions and services.”

 

In fact, the opposite is true. If courts later determine Trump “overstepped his authority,” jobs and programs can — and probably will — be restored. But if the lower court’s injunction were allowed to stand, and the courts eventually sided with the administration, American taxpayers would be out millions in potential savings that could have been accrued as the issue was litigated.

The high court decision was apparently 8-1, representing a bipartisan consensus. Only liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, decrying the ruling’s “enormous real-world consequences.” She misses the point. The sole legal issue is whether the president enjoys the power to take such action. It took another liberal justice, Sonia Sotomayor, to point out to her colleague that “the relevant executive order directs agencies to plan reorganizations and reductions in force ‘consistent with applicable law.’ ”

If the White House steps out of line while executing its makeover of the federal workforce, the courts may course correct. In the meantime, Trump is free to fulfill one of his primary campaign promises.

_____


©2025 Las Vegas Review-Journal. Visit reviewjournal.com.. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

The ACLU

ACLU

By The ACLU
Amy Goodman

Amy Goodman

By Amy Goodman
Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

By Ben Shapiro
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Bill Press

Bill Press

By Bill Press
Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

By Bonnie Jean Feldkamp
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
Christine Flowers

Christine Flowers

By Christine Flowers
Clarence Page

Clarence Page

By Clarence Page
Danny Tyree

Danny Tyree

By Danny Tyree
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Debra Saunders

Debra Saunders

By Debra Saunders
Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

By Dennis Prager
Dick Polman

Dick Polman

By Dick Polman
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
Froma Harrop

Froma Harrop

By Froma Harrop
Jacob Sullum

Jacob Sullum

By Jacob Sullum
Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

By Jamie Stiehm
Jeff Robbins

Jeff Robbins

By Jeff Robbins
Jessica Johnson

Jessica Johnson

By Jessica Johnson
Jim Hightower

Jim Hightower

By Jim Hightower
Joe Conason

Joe Conason

By Joe Conason
Joe Guzzardi

Joe Guzzardi

By Joe Guzzardi
John Micek

John Micek

By John Micek
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Marc Munroe Dion

Marc Munroe Dion

By Marc Munroe Dion
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Mona Charen

Mona Charen

By Mona Charen
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
Robert B. Reich

Robert B. Reich

By Robert B. Reich
Ruben Navarrett Jr.

Ruben Navarrett Jr

By Ruben Navarrett Jr.
Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus

By Ruth Marcus
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Susan Estrich

Susan Estrich

By Susan Estrich
Ted Rall

Ted Rall

By Ted Rall
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Tom Purcell

Tom Purcell

By Tom Purcell
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Daryl Cagle Michael de Adder Adam Zyglis Drew Sheneman Pedro X. Molina Joel Pett